Our Disclaimer

Nothing contained in this blog or on www.keytlaw.com is legal advice. This is just a website that provides information about the law designed to help people deal with their legal needs. Legal information provided on this website is not the same as legal advice, i.e., the application of the law to a person’s specific circumstances.

We try to make our legal information accurate and useful, but we recommend that you consult a lawyer if you want professional assurance that our information and your interpretation of it is appropriate to your particular situation and legal needs.

Our blog and website is also an indirect advertisement for legal services by our attorneys who are licensed to practice law in Arizona. Neither KEYTLaw, LLC, nor any of its attorneys are your attorney and you are not our client unless you enter into a written agreement with us to provide legal services.

Appeals Court OKs $5M in Punitives for Victim of Phone Hoax Strip Search

ABA Journal News: “The state Court of Appeals upheld a $5 million award of punitive damages to the then 18-year-old worker who was targeted by the fake law enforcement officer on the phone.  The restaurant chain could have foreseen and prevented the incident by alerting and training employees, reports the Courier-Journal.  In its ruling Friday, the unanimous three-judge appellate panel noted that the hoax was one of some 30 incidents that had occurred at McDonald’s restaurants over a decade. Proper training of employees, the court said, likely would have prevented the young worker’s three-hour ordeal, in which she was also sexually abused.”

See the important comments made by Overlawyered about the alleged perpetrator of the hoax.

What the press coverage to date has not mentioned is that the person who almost certainly perpetrated the incident was acquitted after the Kentucky case fell apart because the criminal defense attorney was able to impeach the witnesses by noting their financial stakes in the civil litigation decided today. Thus, thanks to our civil litigation system’s quest for the deep pocket, the guilty party went free and a tertiary innocent victim got hit with damages. Which is precisely why it’s a misnomer when trial lawyers rename themselves associations for “justice.”

Related posts:

  1. Employee Injured While Dancing In a Night Club After a Firm Dinner Wins $6 Million Judgment
  2. Oops – False Arrest at Wal-Mart Gets 24 Year Old Woman $9 Million
  3. Plaintiff Wins $1,791 in 1st Amendment Case, County’s Legal Fees Were $464,242
  4. Court of Appeals Upholds $16 Million Award for Framing Father for Alleged Child Molestation
  5. Novartis Hit With $250 Million in Punitives in Gender Bias Case
  6. Appeals Court OKs Hot Burger Lawsuit
  7. Harrassment Lawsuit Alleges Cucumber Prank
  8. Appeals Court Upholds Marine’s Indecent Language Conviction for Saying “Mmmm-mmmm-mmmm”
  9. Court Says Employer Should Not Have Fired Employee for MySpace Comments
  10. Lawsuit Literally Out of Left Field – NY Appeals Court Tosses Another Foul Ball Injury Case

Leave a Reply

 

 

 

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree