<?xml version="1.0"?>
<oembed><version>1.0</version><provider_name>Arizona LLC Law</provider_name><provider_url>https://www.keytlaw.com/azllclaw</provider_url><author_name>Richard Keyt</author_name><author_url>https://www.keytlaw.com/azllclaw/author/1llclawyer/</author_url><title>Arizona Sues California Over California's $800/Year LLC Rip Off Tax</title><type>rich</type><width>600</width><height>338</height><html>&lt;blockquote class="wp-embedded-content" data-secret="vdgCotTpbx"&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.keytlaw.com/azllclaw/2019/03/az-ca/"&gt;Arizona Sues California Over California&#x2019;s $800/Year LLC Rip Off Tax&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;iframe sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" src="https://www.keytlaw.com/azllclaw/2019/03/az-ca/embed/#?secret=vdgCotTpbx" width="600" height="338" title="&#x201C;Arizona Sues California Over California&#x2019;s $800/Year LLC Rip Off Tax&#x201D; &#x2014; Arizona LLC Law" data-secret="vdgCotTpbx" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" class="wp-embedded-content"&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;&lt;script type="text/javascript"&gt;
/* &lt;![CDATA[ */
/*! This file is auto-generated */
!function(d,l){"use strict";l.querySelector&amp;&amp;d.addEventListener&amp;&amp;"undefined"!=typeof URL&amp;&amp;(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&amp;&amp;!/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),c=new RegExp("^https?:$","i"),i=0;i&lt;o.length;i++)o[i].style.display="none";for(i=0;i&lt;a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&amp;&amp;(s.removeAttribute("style"),"height"===t.message?(1e3&lt;(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r&lt;200&amp;&amp;(r=200),s.height=r):"link"===t.message&amp;&amp;(r=new URL(s.getAttribute("src")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&amp;&amp;n.host===r.host&amp;&amp;l.activeElement===s&amp;&amp;(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener("message",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll("iframe.wp-embedded-content"),r=0;r&lt;s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute("data-secret"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+="#?secret="+t,e.setAttribute("data-secret",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:"ready",secret:t},"*")},!1)))}(window,document);
//# sourceURL=https://www.keytlaw.com/azllclaw/wp-includes/js/wp-embed.min.js
/* ]]&gt; */
&lt;/script&gt;
</html><description>Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich announced today [March 11, 2019] that his office recently filed suit in the U.S. Supreme Court against the State of California seeking to invalidate California&#x2019;s extraterritorial tax assessments and seizures, which result from an unconstitutional &#x201C;doing business&#x201D; tax against businesses and individuals that don&#x2019;t actually conduct any business in California. Every year, California assesses an $800 &#x201C;doing business&#x201D; taxes against Arizona businesses that conduct no actual business in California.&#xA0;Instead, their only connection to California is a mere passive, non-managing investment in a California limited liability company.&#xA0;California continues to assess these &#x201C;doing business&#x201D; taxes even though both its state courts and tax appeals agency have held that the taxes are illegal under California law. The lawsuit filed by Arizona alleges that these taxes are plainly unconstitutional under the Due Process and Commerce Clauses of the U.S. Constitution. The Supreme Court has held that passive investment in a company located in another state is not sufficient &#x201C;minimum contacts&#x201D; to impose taxation under the Due Process Clause (Shaffer v. Heitner, 433 U.S. 186 (1977)). The Supreme Court has also recognized four requirements for states to impose taxes on out-of-state businesses under the Commerce Clause.&#xA0; California&#x2019;s &#x201C;doing business&#x201D; assessments brazenly violate all four. The amounts collected by these &#x201C;doing business&#x201D; assessments are substantial. Arizona estimates that its citizens pay over $10 million&#xA0;in these unconstitutional taxes to the State of California every year. These taxes also impact Arizona&#x2019;s tax collections.&#xA0;Since the &#x201C;doing business&#x201D; taxes are deductible expenses, Arizona loses an estimated $484,000 in tax revenue each year due to California&#x2019;s illegal taxation. These figures are further compounded since the tax applies to all individuals in other states who invest in California businesses. Extraterritorial Seizures Making [...]</description></oembed>
