<?xml version="1.0"?>
<oembed><version>1.0</version><provider_name>Arizona LLC Law</provider_name><provider_url>https://www.keytlaw.com/azllclaw</provider_url><author_name>Richard Keyt</author_name><author_url>https://www.keytlaw.com/azllclaw/author/1llclawyer/</author_url><title>Enforcing Charging Order on Foreign LLC</title><type>rich</type><width>600</width><height>338</height><html>&lt;blockquote class="wp-embedded-content" data-secret="u6ZW8nepBf"&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.keytlaw.com/azllclaw/2016/04/kaplan-miller/"&gt;Enforcing Charging Order on Foreign LLC&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;iframe sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" src="https://www.keytlaw.com/azllclaw/2016/04/kaplan-miller/embed/#?secret=u6ZW8nepBf" width="600" height="338" title="&#x201C;Enforcing Charging Order on Foreign LLC&#x201D; &#x2014; Arizona LLC Law" data-secret="u6ZW8nepBf" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" class="wp-embedded-content"&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;&lt;script type="text/javascript"&gt;
/* &lt;![CDATA[ */
/*! This file is auto-generated */
!function(d,l){"use strict";l.querySelector&amp;&amp;d.addEventListener&amp;&amp;"undefined"!=typeof URL&amp;&amp;(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&amp;&amp;!/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),c=new RegExp("^https?:$","i"),i=0;i&lt;o.length;i++)o[i].style.display="none";for(i=0;i&lt;a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&amp;&amp;(s.removeAttribute("style"),"height"===t.message?(1e3&lt;(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r&lt;200&amp;&amp;(r=200),s.height=r):"link"===t.message&amp;&amp;(r=new URL(s.getAttribute("src")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&amp;&amp;n.host===r.host&amp;&amp;l.activeElement===s&amp;&amp;(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener("message",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll("iframe.wp-embedded-content"),r=0;r&lt;s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute("data-secret"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+="#?secret="+t,e.setAttribute("data-secret",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:"ready",secret:t},"*")},!1)))}(window,document);
//# sourceURL=https://www.keytlaw.com/azllclaw/wp-includes/js/wp-embed.min.js
/* ]]&gt; */
&lt;/script&gt;
</html><description>Arizona, like Nevada, provides that the sole remedy of a creditor that gets a judgment against a member of an LLC formed in the state is to serve a charging order on the LLC.&#xA0; The charging order is a court order that if money or property is to be distributed or paid to the debtor/member the money or property must be paid to the creditor instead. The Kaplan vs. Miller case below illustrates how a creditor can win a judgment in state A against a member of an LLC formed in state B and get a court in state B to issue the charging order against the LLC.&#xA0; The creditor domesticates the judgment in the state where the LLC was formed and then asks a court in state B to issue the charging order. STEPHEN KAPLAN, P.C., Plaintiff(s), v. CAMERON L. MILLER, Defendant(s). Case No. 2:15-CV-1395 JCM (PAL). United States District Court, D. Nevada. March 24, 2016. ORDER JAMES C. MAHAN, District Judge. Presently before the court is plaintiff Stephen Kaplan, P.C.&#x2019;s (&#x201C;Kaplan&#x201D;) motion for charging order. (Doc. # 6). Defendant Cameron L. Miller, who has not made an appearance in this matter, has not responded. The time for doing so has passed. On March 6, 2015, plaintiff recovered a judgment against defendant in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas. (Doc. # 6-1). Plaintiff initiated the present matter by domesticating that judgment in this district. It filed a motion for a writ of execution with this court (doc. # 4), which the court granted. (Doc. # 5). Plaintiff, as a judgment creditor, now moves the court for an order charging defendant&#x2019;s ownership interests in two Nevada limited liability companies (&#x201C;LLCs&#x201D;) with [...]</description></oembed>
