Enter email address to get emails of new content.

What You Get for $599

Our Disclaimer

Nothing contained in this blog or on www.keytlaw.com is legal advice. This is just a website that provides information about the law designed to help people deal with their legal needs. Legal information provided on this website is not the same as legal advice, i.e., the application of the law to a person’s specific circumstances.

We try to make our legal information accurate and useful, but we recommend that you consult a lawyer if you want professional assurance that our information and your interpretation of it is appropriate to your particular situation and legal needs.

Our blog and website is also an indirect advertisement for legal services by our attorneys who are licensed to practice law in Arizona. Neither KEYTLaw, LLC, nor any of its attorneys are your attorney and you are not our client unless you enter into a written agreement with us to provide legal services.

Red-light Cameras Go Dark Across California

California Watch:  “While the state collects millions of dollars from red-light cameras at intersections, a few California cities are starting to question whether the safety benefits are worth the high cost to their own coffers. . . . Other cities have rejected automatic ticketing programs as well, including Union City near San Jose, [...]

Tempe Man Sues, Claims Photo Enforcement is Fraud

Arizona Republic:  “A Tempe man is suing to get rid of the city’s photo enforcement system, saying it commits fraud by issuing tickets to people who weren’t really speeding.  Daniel Arthur Gutenkauf, 59, of Tempe said the system couldn’t differentiate between him and his identical twin brother, but sent him a citation anyway.”

[...]

Arizona: Racketeering Suit Filed Against Speed Cameras

thenewspaper.com:  “A motorist is using federal anti-racketeering statutes to go after the red light camera and speed camera program in Tempe, Arizona. Dan Gutenkauf filed his complaint last week in the US District Court for the District of Arizona. . . . The suit names Redflex employees, police officials, politicians and judges as [...]

CA Red Light Cameras Nailing Perps for Lots of Violations of Law

Findlaw:  “The LA Times now reports that the intersection cameras may be put to work for more than just red light violations. . . . Other violations include: talking on a cellphone, not wearing a seat belt, not yielding to a pedestrian in a crosswalk, reckless driving, and expired registration.”

New Focus in Arizona Speed-camera Fight

Arizona Republic:  “A citizens group behind a failed statewide initiative drive to ban photo enforcement is now focusing its efforts on the 14 Arizona cities and towns that use the traffic cameras.”

Arizona Shuts Down Speed Cameras on Freeways

Arizona Republic:  “Speed cameras on freeways across Arizona went dark just before midnight last night [July 15, 2010], ending the state’s controversial experiment with photo enforcement.”

Arizona Speed Cameras Go Dark on July 15, 2010

Arizona Republic: “Arizona ends its groundbreaking speed enforcement program Thursday with the expiration of a company’s two-year contract that put dozens of cameras along Phoenix-area freeways and other highways across the state.  Panned by critics as intended more as a way to generate revenue than improve safety, the contract that the Department of [...]

Congressman Says Red-light Cameras are All About Money, Not Safety

Knoxnews:  “U.S. Rep. John J. Duncan Jr. thinks he knows why cash-strapped communities around the country are installing red-light traffic cameras, and it has nothing to do with making streets and highways safer.  It’s about making money, he said. . . . ‘If it’s not, then let everybody who is fined contribute to [...]

Arizona Photo Speed-enforcement may not be Gone for Good

Arizona Republic:  “Even as the Arizona Department of Public Safety was preparing to shut down the statewide photo speed-enforcement system, a top commander was lobbying legislators to approve a photo-enforcement bill giving DPS full control of the program, raising questions about the department’s intentions.”