Law.com: “Plaintiff sues your client, claiming that his injuries have significantly affected his lifestyle. He is unable to work, travel or bowl. Not surprisingly, his spouse alleges loss of consortium. On the eve of trial, you discover pictures and other details on a social networking website about plaintiff’s recent trip to the International Bowling Museum & Hall of Fame, including a picture of plaintiff proudly holding a fluorescent orange bowling ball and a four-foot tall gilded trophy dated four days earlier. As you approach the witness with printouts of the web pages, you are stopped in your tracks: “Objection, lack of foundation.”
If proper steps are not taken to admit the evidence, the value of this information may be lost.
Related posts:
- Prying Into a Teen’s Private Facebook Pages
- MySpace Quietly Won Goofy 230 Ruling in September
- How to Lose a Cybersqatting Case against a Serial Cybersquatter
- Ripoff Report Wins Defamation Lawsuit Arising from Online Criticism
- Court Refuses Request to Unmask Anonymous Blogger who Was Not a Party to a Suit
- Lawsuit Aainst State Officials for Privacy Violation Moves Forward
- Court Rules Woman Who Posted Comments on a Blog is not a Journalist Protected by NJ Shield Law
- New Rules: Endorsements & Testimonials in Marketing
- Radioshacksucks.com Wrested from the Hands of Cyber-Squatter
- Web Designer & Customer Liable for Copyright Infringement
Recent Comments