Our Disclaimer

Nothing contained in this blog or on www.keytlaw.com is legal advice. This is just a website that provides information about the law designed to help people deal with their legal needs. Legal information provided on this website is not the same as legal advice, i.e., the application of the law to a person’s specific circumstances.

We try to make our legal information accurate and useful, but we recommend that you consult a lawyer if you want professional assurance that our information and your interpretation of it is appropriate to your particular situation and legal needs.

Our blog and website is also an indirect advertisement for legal services by our attorneys who are licensed to practice law in Arizona. Neither KEYTLaw, LLC, nor any of its attorneys are your attorney and you are not our client unless you enter into a written agreement with us to provide legal services.

Will Gun-Control Case Prompt a Constitutional Reawakening?

Wall St. Journal:  “Our interest in a single Supreme Court case has perhaps never been as high as it is in a case currently being briefed.  The issues are fascinating on several levels, and the potential impact of a ruling is big.   The case is McDonald v. City of Chicago, for which the court granted cert on Sept. 30.  The petitioners in the case, a group challenging a gun-control ordinance in Chicago, filed their brief with the court earlier this week.  Were the court to adopt their position — something well within the realm of possibility — we could be looking at a significant shift in the way the justices view the Constitution and individual rights.”

  • Share/Bookmark

Related posts:

  1. Pledge of Allegiance in Schools Ruled Constitutional on Appeal
  2. Health-Care Reform and the Constitution
  3. Challenge to Redskins Name Reaches Supreme Court
  4. SEC Settles a Portion of Radical Bunny Case
  5. Sotomayor Issues Challenge to a Century of Corporate Law
  6. What Are You Doing Legally on Twitter?
  7. Professor Wins Copyright Case & Fees from James Joyce Estate
  8. District Court Ruling Clarifies Extent to which a Website Can Permit Publication of Illegal Content but Retain Communications Decency Act Immunity
  9. Supremes to Decide Dispute Over Right to Make NFL Gear
  10. ‘Flying Imams’ Settlement Carries Costs for Air Safety

Leave a Reply

Quicktags:

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree