Our Disclaimer

Nothing contained in this blog or on www.keytlaw.com is legal advice. This is just a website that provides information about the law designed to help people deal with their legal needs. Legal information provided on this website is not the same as legal advice, i.e., the application of the law to a person’s specific circumstances.

We try to make our legal information accurate and useful, but we recommend that you consult a lawyer if you want professional assurance that our information and your interpretation of it is appropriate to your particular situation and legal needs.

Our blog and website is also an indirect advertisement for legal services by our attorneys who are licensed to practice law in Arizona. Neither KEYTLaw, LLC, nor any of its attorneys are your attorney and you are not our client unless you enter into a written agreement with us to provide legal services.

Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act

Bev Stayart sued Yahoo, but a federal court dismissed her complaint.  Bev claimed that she is the only person who uses her name on the internet.  She searched for her name at yahoo.com and altavista.com and found many spam sites offering to sell Cialis (and other related drugs) or that contained explicit banner ads for adultfriendfinder.com.  Bev Stayart sued Yahoo and Overture (former owner of altavista.com, which was acquired by Yahoo)  for false endorsement under the Lanham Act and violation of privacy.

Bev’s claims were barred by Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act.

Section 230 grants interactive online services of all types, including news websites, blogs, forums, and listservs, broad immunity from certain types of legal liability stemming from content created by others.

  • Share/Bookmark

Related posts:

  1. Top Cyberlaw Developments of 2009
  2. Keylogger Software Company Not Liable for Eavesdropping by Ex-spouse
  3. Judge Tosses Sheriff’s Suit Against Craigslist Over Prostitution Ads
  4. Online Publisher Not Subject to Injunction Against Original Author of Defamatory Posts
  5. Court Says Employer Should Not Have Fired Employee for MySpace Comments
  6. Ripoff Report Wins Defamation Lawsuit Arising from Online Criticism
  7. Federal Court Upholds Attorney-Client Privilege for Employee’s Private Communications to which Employer Had Access
  8. Facebook’s New Privacy Changes: The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly
  9. May Employers Monitor Personal E-mail? Cases Turn on Disclosure
  10. Digital Assets of Deceased Raises Questions for Heirs

Leave a Reply

Quicktags:

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree