HomeAboutContactOffice LocationLaw FormsSearchForm LLC Now

TestimonialsFree NewslettersSite MapSend Page to FriendOur Store

 

LLCsCorporationsReal EstateEstate PlanningLandlord LawAZ LawStatutes

Home
LLC Library
KEYTLaw Store
Attorneys & Staff
What's New
Table of Contents
Fixed Fee Services
Arizona Law
AZ Statutes
Corporation Library
Estate Plan Library
IRA Library
Law Forms Library
Articles Library
Probate FAQ
Real Estate Law
Landlord Tenant
Domain Name Law
Internet Law
Trademark Law
Copyright Law
Rick Keyt's Articles
Office Map
Contact Info
Inspirational Words
Flying the F-4
Law Office Tech
For Lawyer Authors
Stats of Interest
Get More Clients
Pages for Rent
Sample Page

You are here: Home  FTC Actions FTC Action Summaries Visions Group

149.  U.S. v. Visions Group of America, et al, (WDNY filed October 18, 2000)

Defendants: Visions Group of America, Inc., SOHO Technologies, Inc., and their principals, Mark Colosi, Rex Judd and Greg Kazimer

Type:  Cooling Off Rule

The FTC alleged that defendants used high-pressure sales tactics to sell various home-based business opportunities based on false and unsubstantiated earnings claims and that defendants violated the FTC's Cooling-Off Rule, which gives consumers three days to cancel certain purchases of $25 or more. The defendants sold various business opportunities including: "Inside Trader," a business that allegedly allowed purchasers to buy brand name merchandise at or below wholesale cost; "Net More Worth" and "Vision Net," businesses that allegedly allowed purchasers to sell classified ads on the Internet for a profit.

The Commission vote to forward the complaint and consent order to the Department of Justice for filing was 4 to 1. They were filed by DOJ at the request of the FTC, in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of New York, on October 18.

The settlement, which is subject to court approval, would prohibit the defendants from making deceptive income, profit, or sales volume claims in connection with the sale of any franchise, business opportunity, or investment. Also, it prohibits the defendants from violating the Cooling-Off Rule, which includes providing various cancellation notices to prospective purchasers, and would require them to pay a $22,000 civil penalty.

http://www.ftc.gov/opa/2000/10/visions.htm (press release - complaint and consent order)

 

This page was last modified on July 22, 2007.

Send Page To a Friend

Subscribe to Richard Keyt's Free Email Newsletters

 

Privacy Policy | Disclaimers | Terms of Use | Suggestions  | Credit Card Security

Website Created by & Copyright ©  2001-2008 Richard Keyt, All Rights Reserved