HomeAboutContactOffice LocationLaw FormsSearchForm LLC Now

TestimonialsFree NewslettersTwitterLaw Videos (Coming)Our Store

                                                                             

LLCsCorporationsReal EstateEstate PlanningLandlord LawAZ LawStatutes

Home
Attorneys & Staff
Fixed Fee Services
KEYTLaw Law Blog
Follow on Twitter
What's New
LLC Library
KEYTLaw Store
Arizona Law
AZ Statutes
Corporation Library
Estate Plan Library
IRA Library
Law Forms Library
A La Cart EP Docs
Articles Library
Probate FAQ
Real Estate Law
Landlord Tenant
Copyright Law
Trademark Law
Domain Name Law
Patent Law
Internet Law
IRS Items
Rick Keyt's Articles
Links
Free Newsletters
About Rick Keyt
Contact Information
Office Map
Website Statistics
Flying the F-4
Inspirational Words
Law Office Tech
KEYTLaw Software
For Lawyer Authors

You are here: Home  FTC Actions FTC Action Summaries iMall

68.  iMall, File No. 972-3224 (stipulated final judgement approved Apr. 15, 1999)

Respondents: iMall, Carl R. Pickering, and Mark R. Commer

Type:  Deceptive Internet Mall Promotions

The Commission alleged that, between July 1995 and August 1998, iMall used direct mail, radio ads, television informercials, a promotional cassette, and telemarketing calls to promote free seminars where consumers would hear about two Internet-related business opportunity programs.  The iMall Opportunity Program offered investors the opportunity to become "consultants" and make money selling Web pages on the iMall site. The Internet Yellow Pages (IYP) program offered investors the opportunity to make money selling advertising space on the IYP Web site contained within the iMall site. The Commission alleged that, at these seminars, the respondents made false earnings claims for their Internet-based businesses and that they violated the Franchise Rule.

On April 15, 1999, the Commission announced a $4 million settlement with the respondents.  The Stipulated Final Judgment and Order barred Craig R. Pickering and Mark R. Comer for life from selling any Internet or pay-per-call business opportunity; barred them for 10 years from selling franchises; required a $500,000 bond before selling certain types of business opportunities; and barred future violations the Franchise Rule. iMall was permanently barred from violating the Franchise Rule and from misrepresenting material facts about any business opportunity it promotes. The Order called for iMall to pay $750,000 and Pickering and Comer to pay $3.25 million in consumer redress.

http://www.ftc.gov/opa/1999/9904/imall1.htm (press release - consent)

 

This page was last modified on July 22, 2007.

Subscribe to Richard Keyt's Free Email Newsletters

 

Privacy Policy | Disclaimers | Terms of Use | Suggestions  | Credit Card Security

Website Created by & Copyright ©  2001-2009 Richard Keyt, All Rights Reserved