HomeAboutContactOffice LocationLaw FormsSearchForm LLC Now

TestimonialsFree NewslettersTwitterLaw Videos (Coming)Our Store

                                                                             

LLCsCorporationsReal EstateEstate PlanningLandlord LawAZ LawStatutes

Home
Attorneys & Staff
Fixed Fee Services
KEYTLaw Law Blog
Follow on Twitter
What's New
LLC Library
KEYTLaw Store
Arizona Law
AZ Statutes
Corporation Library
Estate Plan Library
IRA Library
Law Forms Library
A La Cart EP Docs
Articles Library
Probate FAQ
Real Estate Law
Landlord Tenant
Copyright Law
Trademark Law
Domain Name Law
Patent Law
Internet Law
IRS Items
Rick Keyt's Articles
Links
Free Newsletters
About Rick Keyt
Contact Information
Office Map
Website Statistics
Flying the F-4
Inspirational Words
Law Office Tech
KEYTLaw Software
For Lawyer Authors

You are here: Home  FTC Actions FTC Action Summaries FutureNet

33.  FTC v. FutureNet, et al., Civil No. 98-1113GHK (AIJx) (Filed February 17, 1998)

Defendants: FutureNet, Inc., FutureNet Online, Inc., Alan J. Setlin, Robert DePew, Larry Stephen Huff, Chris Lobato, and David Soto

Type:  Pyramid Scheme

Defendants claimed recruits could earn substantial incomes by joining a multilevel marketing program selling Internet access devices, but according to the Commission, defendants ran an illegal pyramid, where income was dependent not on product sales but on recruitment of paying members "downline."

On February 23, 1998, the Court issued a temporary restraining order freezing defendants’ assets and appointing a receiver for the corporate defendants. On March 6, 1998, the Court issued a preliminary injunction continuing the TRO’s provisions.

On April 8, 1998, a stipulated final judgment was filed, banning the corporate defendants and two individual defendants from operating pyramid schemes and selling distributorships through multi-level marketing; ordering payment of $1,000,000 in consumer redress, and requiring a bond of $100,000 to $1,000,000, to escalate as sales grow, before engaging in any multi-level marketing.

On Nov. 24, 1998, Larry Stephen Huff agreed to settle allegations against him. The proposed settlement would bar him from participating in future pyramid schemes and any form of multi-level marketing. Based on Mr. Huff’s financial disclosures, no consumer redress was ordered. However, should those financial disclosure statements prove to be false, an avalanche clause would make Huff liable for $21 million in consumer redress.

On Dec. 22, 1998, the Commission announced settlements with the two remaining defendants, Robert De Pew and David Soto. The settlements bar them from: participating in any future pyramid schemes; misrepresenting sales, earnings or other material facts about products or services they sell; selling electric power or other energy services without meeting licensing and registration requirements; and participating in any multi-level marketing program owned, operated or controlled by the other FutureNet principals. Both defendants also are required to obtain $1 million performance bonds before engaging in future multi-level marketing. If their financial disclosure statements are shown to be false, they also will face a $21 million judgment.

http://www.ftc.gov/opa/1998/9803/netopp.htm (press release - complaint / TRO)

http://www.ftc.gov/opa/1998/9804/futurenet.htm (press release - settlement w FutureNet)

http://www.ftc.gov/opa/1998/9811/huff.htm (press release - settlement w Huff)

http://www.ftc.gov/opa/1998/9812/depew.htm (press release - settlement w DePew, DeSoto)

 

This page was last modified on July 22, 2007.

Subscribe to Richard Keyt's Free Email Newsletters

 

Privacy Policy | Disclaimers | Terms of Use | Suggestions  | Credit Card Security

Website Created by & Copyright ©  2001-2009 Richard Keyt, All Rights Reserved