HomeAboutContactOffice LocationDownloadsSearchForm LLC Now

TestimonialsFree NewslettersSite MapSend Page to FriendOur Store

 

LLCsCorporationsReal EstateEstate PlanningLandlord LawAZ LawStatutes

LLC Library
KEYTLaw Store
Attorneys & Staff
What's New
Table of Contents
Fixed Fee Services
Arizona Law
AZ Statutes
Corporation Library
Estate Plan Library
IRA Library
Probate FAQ
Real Estate Law
Landlord Tenant
Copyright Law
Trademark Law
Domain Name Law
Internet Law
IRS Items
Rick Keyt's Articles
Links
Free Newsletters
About Rick Keyt
Contact Information
Office Map
Website Statistics
Flying the F-4
Inspirational Words
Law Office Tech
KEYTLaw Software
For Lawyer Authors

______________

Previous

Next

Bogus Domain Names
Do Not Call List
Auction Fraud
Pretexting
Anthrax Cure
Cancer Cures
Spam
Spam I
Spam II
Spam III
Spam IV
Spam V
Spam Harvest
Spam & Junk Faxes
FTC Actions Home
John Zuccarini
John Zuccarini II
Illegal Billing
Phone Scam
User Data
Liverite Claims
Comfrey II
Comfrey I
Internet Access
Credit Repair
Access Fees
Access Fees II
Online Learning
Healthcare Fraud I
Healthcare Fraud II
Healthcare Products
Healthcare Products II
Snore Formula
Internet Services
Free Services
Junk Faxes
COPPA Fines
COPPA Fines II
COPPA Fines III
COPPA Fines IV
COPPA IV
Web Crammers
Bogus Charges
Pyramid Scheme
Pyramid Scheme II
Pyramid Scheme III
Pyramid Scheme IV
Domain Name Scam
Domain Name Scam II
Domain Name Scam III
Page Jacking
Work at Home
Work At Home II
Work at Home III
Country of Origin
Mail Order Rule
Mail Order Rule II
Mail Order Rule III
Mail Order Rule IV
Playgirl.com

You are here: Home  FTC Actions FTC Internet Enforcement FTC Asks Court

FTC Asks Court to Block Deceptive Spam Operation

Misleading Subject Lines Allegedly Exposed Unwitting Consumers to Sexually Explicit Material

April 17, 2003

The Federal Trade Commission has asked a U.S. District court judge to block an allegedly illegal spam operation that uses deceptively bland subject lines, false return addresses, and empty "reply-to" links to expose unsuspecting consumers, including children, to sexually explicit material. The agency alleges that Brian Westby used the spam in an attempt to drive business to an adult Web site, "Married But Lonely." The FTC has asked the court to order a halt to the deceptive spam, pending trial. It will seek a permanent injunction at trial.

According to the FTC complaint, the defendant sent spam with subject lines that would disguise the contents of the e-mail. For example, subject lines have included "Did you hear the news?" and "New movie info." When consumers opened the e-mail messages, they were immediately subjected to sexually explicit solicitations to visit the defendant's adult-oriented Web sites. Because of the deceptive subject lines, consumers had no reason to expect to see such material, the FTC alleges. In some cases, consumers may have opened the e-mails in their offices, in violation of company policies. In other cases, children may have been exposed to inappropriate adult-oriented material, the FTC complaint notes. The defendant's spam provides a hyperlink or an e-mail address for consumers who wish to "unsubscribe"or stop receiving e-mail in the future. According to the FTC, when consumers used the hyperlink or e-mail address in an attempt to get off the mailing list, they received an error message - they could not unsubscribe.

The FTC also alleges that the defendant used false "reply to" or "from" information in the e-mail, making it appear that some innocent third party was the sender. This practice is known as "spoofing." As a result, thousands of undeliverable e-mails flooded back to the computer systems of these third parties, deluging their computer systems with an influx of spam that couldn't be delivered to the addressee. In addition, it unfairly portrayed these innocent bystanders as duplicitous spammers, often resulting in their receiving hundreds of angry e-mails from those that had been spammed, according to the FTC.

In papers filed with the court, the agency says the deceptive practices violate the FTC Act. The complaint says the defendant and his businesses have and will continue to injure consumers, and that the defendant has been unjustly enriched as the result of his illegal scheme. The agency has asked the court to halt the scheme.

Brian D. Westby is based in the St. Louis, Missouri suburb of Ballwin.

The FTC vote to file the complaint was 5-0. It was filed in U. S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division

Related Documents:

Brian D. Westby, FTC v., FTC File No. 032 3030

The above article was reprinted from an announcement on the Federal Trade Commission web site dated April 17, 2003.  Check the FTC web site for any changes to the article.

 

This page was last modified on July 22, 2007.

Send Page To a Friend

Subscribe to Richard Keyt's Free Email Newsletters

 

Privacy Policy | Disclaimers | Terms of Use | Suggestions  | Credit Card Security

Website Created by & Copyright ©  2001-2008 Richard Keyt, All Rights Reserved