HomeAboutContactOffice LocationDownloadsSearchForm LLC Now

TestimonialsFree NewslettersSite MapSend Page to FriendOur Store

 

LLCsCorporationsReal EstateEstate PlanningLandlord LawAZ LawStatutes

LLC Library
KEYTLaw Store
Attorneys & Staff
What's New
Table of Contents
Fixed Fee Services
Arizona Law
AZ Statutes
Corporation Library
Estate Plan Library
IRA Library
Probate FAQ
Real Estate Law
Landlord Tenant
Copyright Law
Trademark Law
Domain Name Law
Internet Law
IRS Items
Rick Keyt's Articles
Links
Free Newsletters
About Rick Keyt
Contact Information
Office Map
Website Statistics
Flying the F-4
Inspirational Words
Law Office Tech
KEYTLaw Software
For Lawyer Authors

______________

Previous

Next

Bogus Domain Names
Do Not Call List
Auction Fraud
Pretexting
Anthrax Cure
Cancer Cures
Spam
Spam I
Spam II
Spam III
Spam IV
Spam V
Spam Harvest
Spam & Junk Faxes
FTC Actions Home
John Zuccarini
John Zuccarini II
Illegal Billing
Phone Scam
User Data
Liverite Claims
Comfrey II
Comfrey I
Internet Access
Credit Repair
Access Fees
Access Fees II
Online Learning
Healthcare Fraud I
Healthcare Fraud II
Healthcare Products
Healthcare Products II
Snore Formula
Internet Services
Free Services
Junk Faxes
COPPA Fines
COPPA Fines II
COPPA Fines III
COPPA Fines IV
COPPA IV
Web Crammers
Bogus Charges
Pyramid Scheme
Pyramid Scheme II
Pyramid Scheme III
Pyramid Scheme IV
Domain Name Scam
Domain Name Scam II
Domain Name Scam III
Page Jacking
Work at Home
Work At Home II
Work at Home III
Country of Origin
Mail Order Rule
Mail Order Rule II
Mail Order Rule III
Mail Order Rule IV
Playgirl.com

You are here: Home  FTC Actions FTC Internet Enforcement Bogus Domain Name Seller

Bogus Domain Name Seller Settles FTC Charges

.USA & .Brit Deceptively Marketed as Useable

December 3, 2002

Operators that allegedly used deceptive spam messages and appeals to patriotism to sell Web addresses that don't work, including ".usa," have agreed to settle Federal Trade Commission charges that the scam violated federal laws. The settlement will bar the defendants from misrepresenting the usability of domain names, require the disclosure of limitations or conditions on the use or function of domain names, and bar the operators from selling their customer lists. The settlement also will provide as much as $300,000 for consumer redress.

In March 2002, at the request of the FTC, a U.S. district court shut down businesses that sold domain names ending with suffixes such as ".brit," and ".scot," and ordered an asset freeze to preserve money for consumer redress. The FTC alleged that after September 11, the companies launched an aggressive spam campaign in the United States to advertise domain names ending in ".usa." Subject lines in their e-mail read, "Be Patriotic! Register .USA Domains." A hyperlink in the e-mail connected consumers to a Web site where they were offered the advertised domain names for $59 each. The FTC alleged that the companies were not accredited domain name registrars, that the ".usa" domain names are not usable on the Internet, and that they probably never will be useable. The FTC has asked the court to permanently bar the operation from deceptively selling the domain names and to order consumer redress. The settlement announced today ends that litigation.

The settlement bars the defendants from making misrepresentations about the usability of domain names or about the nature of any product or service they sell over the Internet. The settlement also bars the defendants from failing to clearly and conspicuously disclose material limitations or conditions on the usability or functionality of domain names. The settlement bars the defendants from selling customer lists. In addition, the defendants will turn over as much as $300,000 being held in merchant accounts for consumer redress. Redress payments will be available to consumers in the UK and other countries, as well as the United States. The settlement also contains record-keeping requirements to allow the FTC to monitor compliance with the court's order.

The original complaint named TLD Network Ltd., Quantum Management (GB) Ltd., TBS Industries Ltd., Thomas Goolnik, and Edward Harris Goolnik of the United Kingdom. The FTC amended its complaint to dismiss Edward Harris Goolnik as a defendant and to add another entity, Quantum Management U.S., Inc., as a defendant.

The Commission vote to accept the stipulated final judgment and order was 5-0.

Related Documents:

FTC v. TLD Network LTD., et al (The Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division)

Stipulated Final Judment and Order for Permanent Injunction and Consumer Redress [PDF 867KB]

The above article was reprinted from an announcement on the Federal Trade Commission web site dated December 3, 2002.  Check the FTC web site for any changes to the article.

 

This page was last modified on July 22, 2007.

Send Page To a Friend

Subscribe to Richard Keyt's Free Email Newsletters

 

Privacy Policy | Disclaimers | Terms of Use | Suggestions  | Credit Card Security

Website Created by & Copyright ©  2001-2008 Richard Keyt, All Rights Reserved