|
|
|
|||
|
______________
|
You are here: Home
Federal, State, Local Netforce Targets CyberscamsConsumers Allegedly Fleeced Out of Millions of DollarsJuly 30, 2002 The Federal Trade Commission, Federal Bureau of Investigation, U.S. Postal Inspection Service, Securities and Exchange Commission, and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, have joined 10 state attorneys general and 11other state and local law enforcement agencies to target cyberscams plaguing the Internet. Today they announced 19 civil and criminal law enforcement actions against scammers who have bilked tens of thousands of consumers out of millions of dollars. "Scams on the Internet spread very quickly," said J. Howard Beales, III, Director of the FTC's Bureau of Consumer Protection. "That's why the FTC and our partners are moving aggressively to shut these schemes down." The FTC asked a U.S. district court judge to shut down an operation that used spam and Internet Web sites to advertise an envelope stuffing work-at-home "opportunity." According to the FTC, in exchange for $40, the defendants promised to provide consumers with sales letters and pre-stamped, pre-addressed envelopes and consumers would earn two dollars for every envelope they stuffed. Consumers who sent their money didn't receive envelopes. If they received anything - and many didn't - they got materials urging them to solicit self-addressed envelopes from third parties and forward them to the defendants. The FTC told the court that the "Stuffing for Cash" defendants likely cheated tens of thousands of consumers out of more than $2 million in the last year. At the request of the FTC, a U.S. district court judge prohibited the defendants from engaging in further deceptive practices and froze their assets, pending trial. In another FTC case, an operator used the Internet to advertise his "discount" Web hosting services - such as domain name registry, Web page design, and technical support - for monthly service fees of $10 to $15. Consumers provided credit card numbers so they could be billed. The FTC alleged that the defendant, Brian Kruchten, doing business as Page Creators, crammed additional unauthorized charges onto consumers' credit cards for supposed "excess bandwidth" use. At the FTC's request, a district court froze the defendant's assets and appointed a receiver, pending trial. The defendant and the receiver later agreed to shut down the defendant's Web hosting business. The defendant has now agreed to settle the FTC charges. The settlement bars him and his companies from billing consumers without their authorization and from representing that consumers are obligated to pay for any Internet service they did not authorize. The settlement also bars Kruchten, for five years, from owning or controlling any business that handles consumer credit or debit card transactions, unless he first obtains a performance bond of $100,000. Based on financial declarations of the defendant, the settlement requires consumer redress in the amount of $6,000. Should the financial statements be found to be inaccurate, $100,000 will be due. The settlement also bars the resale of customer lists and contains record-keeping requirements to allow the FTC to monitor compliance with the provisions of the order. Law enforcement actions by the FTC's law enforcement partners range from Internet auction fraud to securities fraud and targeted scammers based in the Midwest. The Midwest Netforce law enforcement partners include: Federal Bureau of Investigation, Cook County State's Attorney's Office, Illinois Attorney General's Office, Indiana Attorney General's Office, Lake County State's Attorney's Office, Kansas Attorney General's Office, Kansas Securities Commission, Kentucky Attorney General's Office, Kentucky Department of Financial Institutions, Kentucky Department of Insurance, Minnesota Attorney General's Office, Missouri Attorney General's Office, Missouri Department of Insurance, North Dakota Attorney General's Office, North Dakota Department of Banking and Financial Institutions, North Dakota Securities Commission, Ogle County State's Attorney's Office, South Dakota Attorney General's Office, U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission, U.S. Postal Inspection Service, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, Wichita District Attorney's Office, Wisconsin Department of Justice, and the Wisconsin Department of Agriculture, Trade & Consumer Protection. The FTC has free publications, "Work-At-Home Schemes," and "Internet Auctions: A Guide for Buyers and Sellers," that are available at www.ftc.gov. It also has special Web sites, www.ftc.gov/makingabuck and www.ftc.gov/spam, designed to help consumers spot and avoid fraud. The Commission votes to file the complaint and the stipulated final judgment and order were 5-0. Related DocumentsMidwest Netforce Announced Actions - Case List FTC v. Bryan J. Kruchten d/b/a Pagecreators, et al. (U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota); Complaint for Injunctive and Other Equitable Relief [PDF 15KB]; Stipulated Final Judgment and Order for Permanent Injunction and Consumer Redress [PDF 35KB] FTC v. Stuffingforcash.com, et al. (U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division); Complaint for Injunctive and Other Equitable Relief [PDF 297KB]; Memorandum Supporting Plaintiff's Ex Parte Motion for Temporary Restraining Order, Other Equitable Relief, and Order to Show Cause Why a Preliminary Injunction Should Not Issue [PDF 739KB]; Temporary Restraining Order With Asset Freeze and Other Equitable Relief [PDF 1.5MB] The above article was reprinted from an announcement on the Federal Trade Commission web site dated July 30, 2002. Check the FTC web site for any changes to the article. |
|||
|
|
This page was last modified on July 22, 2007.
Privacy Policy | Disclaimers | Terms of Use | Suggestions | Credit Card Security Website Created by & Copyright © 2001-2008 Richard Keyt, All Rights Reserved |