HomeAboutContactOffice LocationDownloadsSearchForm LLC Now

TestimonialsFree NewslettersSite MapSend Page to FriendOur Store

 

LLCsCorporationsReal EstateEstate PlanningLandlord LawAZ LawStatutes

LLC Library
KEYTLaw Store
Attorneys & Staff
What's New
Table of Contents
Fixed Fee Services
Arizona Law
AZ Statutes
Corporation Library
Estate Plan Library
IRA Library
Probate FAQ
Real Estate Law
Landlord Tenant
Copyright Law
Trademark Law
Domain Name Law
Internet Law
IRS Items
Rick Keyt's Articles
Links
Free Newsletters
About Rick Keyt
Contact Information
Office Map
Website Statistics
Flying the F-4
Inspirational Words
Law Office Tech
KEYTLaw Software
For Lawyer Authors

______________

Previous

Next

Bogus Domain Names
Do Not Call List
Auction Fraud
Pretexting
Anthrax Cure
Cancer Cures
Spam
Spam I
Spam II
Spam III
Spam IV
Spam V
Spam Harvest
Spam & Junk Faxes
FTC Actions Home
John Zuccarini
John Zuccarini II
Illegal Billing
Phone Scam
User Data
Liverite Claims
Comfrey II
Comfrey I
Internet Access
Credit Repair
Access Fees
Access Fees II
Online Learning
Healthcare Fraud I
Healthcare Fraud II
Healthcare Products
Healthcare Products II
Snore Formula
Internet Services
Free Services
Junk Faxes
COPPA Fines
COPPA Fines II
COPPA Fines III
COPPA Fines IV
COPPA IV
Web Crammers
Bogus Charges
Pyramid Scheme
Pyramid Scheme II
Pyramid Scheme III
Pyramid Scheme IV
Domain Name Scam
Domain Name Scam II
Domain Name Scam III
Page Jacking
Work at Home
Work At Home II
Work at Home III
Country of Origin
Mail Order Rule
Mail Order Rule II
Mail Order Rule III
Mail Order Rule IV
Playgirl.com

You are here: Home  FTC Actions FTC Internet Enforcement Access Fee Scan

FTC Sues to Halt Deceptive Internet Access Fee Scam

Agency Seeks Return of Consumers' Membership Fees and Personal Information

June 18, 2001

The Federal Trade Commission has filed suit in U.S. District Court against an Internet operation, www.rhinopoint.com, that conned consumers into paying membership fees and turning over sensitive personal and financial information by deceptively claiming it would pay their Internet access fees. The agency charges that more than 50,000 consumers were taken in by the scam and that the defendants actually paid the access fees for fewer than five percent of them. On June 1, 2001, the Court entered a stipulated preliminary injunction order that prohibits misrepresentations, freezes the defendants' assets, and bars the use of the consumer data, pending trial.

In papers filed with the court, the FTC charges that, starting in November 1999, the defendants operated the rhinopoint.com Web site where they offered to pay Internet access fees to consumers who became part of their "network," and paid a one-time "set-up" fee ranging from $10 to $16. To join the network, consumers completed a questionnaire detailing personal information and agreed to complete monthly marketing surveys. At least 59,000 enrolled, according to the FTC, many of them drawn to the site by their own Internet service providers which advertised that they could receive free or reduced-cost Internet service by going to the Web site and signing up. Consumers who signed up were required to complete "member profile forms" that asked for such information as credit card numbers and income level. The Web site claimed it marketed "group data response to companies that provide us survey questions for our members." The site's privacy policy stated, "We do not sell or provide individual names, addresses, phone numbers, credit information or other personal contact information data to outside parties under any circumstances."

The FTC alleges that the operation pocketed about $500,000 in "set-up" fees and obtained consumers' personal information from the questionnaire they originally filled out, but did not follow up with "marketing surveys" or pay Internet access fees for most of the consumers. "Defendants rarely sent the promised surveys, even more rarely reimbursed consumers for their Internet access costs, but collected initial setup fees and personal information from tens of thousands of consumers anyway," court documents say.

The FTC is seeking a permanent halt to the scam, a ban on the use of the consumers' personal and financial information, and redress for consumers.

The FTC complaint names New Millennium Concepts, Inc., doing business as Rhinopoint.com and Karl V. Kay of Hoffman Estates, Illinois.

The Commission vote to file the complaint was 5-0.

Related Documents:

FTC v. New Millennium Concepts, Inc., d/b/a Rhinopoint.com, et al. (Northern Dist. of Ill.)

Complaint For Injunctive And Other Equitable Relief

The above article was reprinted from an announcement on the Federal Trade Commission web site dated June 18, 2001.  Check the FTC web site for any changes to the article.

 

This page was last modified on July 22, 2007.

Send Page To a Friend

Subscribe to Richard Keyt's Free Email Newsletters

 

Privacy Policy | Disclaimers | Terms of Use | Suggestions  | Credit Card Security

Website Created by & Copyright ©  2001-2008 Richard Keyt, All Rights Reserved