 |
|
|||
|
______________
|
You are here: Home
Bigsmart Pyramid Promoters Settle FTC Charges$5 Million for Consumer RedressMarch 27, 2001 Operators of an Internet-based business opportunity that promised easy income for investors in an Internet shopping mall network have agreed to settle Federal Trade Commission charges that their scheme was an illegal pyramid operation. Under the terms of the settlement, Bigsmart.Com L.L.C. and principals Mark and Harry Tahiliani will provide up to $5 million in consumer redress and post a $500,000 performance bond before engaging in any new multi-level marketing activity. The defendants also are prohibited from engaging in any illegal pyramid schemes. Bigsmart is based in Mesa, Arizona. According to the FTC complaint detailing the charges, Bigsmart marketed Internet theme "malls" that it claimed would enable investors to earn substantial income from commissions on products purchased through the Internet. The malls were a collection of links to retail sites maintained by independent third-party merchants, such as MarthaStewart.com, and to a "Superstore" maintained by Bigsmart, itself. Traffic was directed to the malls through the personalized Bigsmart "welcome pages" that members bought access to for a $10 application fee and a $99.95 "hosting" fee. Although Bigsmart claimed that members would make substantial amounts of money, the scheme was structured in such way that to realize continued financial gains, would depend on ". . . the continued, successive recruitment of other participants," not on retail sales of products and services to the public. The FTC charged that the claims that consumers who invested in Bigsmart would make substantial income were false; that promotional materials that made the false and misleading claims provided the means and instrumentalities for others to deceive consumers; and that Bigsmart was actually a pyramid scheme. All three were violations of the FTC Act. To settle the FTC charges, Bigsmart and the Tahilianis will provide up to $5 million in consumer redress. They also will be required to post a $500,000 performance bond before engaging in any new multi-level marketing activity. Consumers who believe they may qualify to receive consumer redress should call 202-326-3294. This case was brought with the invaluable assistance of the Offices of the Attorney General of Texas and the Wisconsin. Department of Agriculture, Trade, & Consumer Protection, Division of Trade & Consumer Protection. It was filed in U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona, March 12, 2001. Related Documents: FTC v. Bigsmart.com L.L.C.; Mark Tahiliani; and Harry Tahiliani (District Court of Arizona) Complaint [PDF 664K] Stipulated Final Order [PDF 1.36M] Stipulated Permanent Injunction [PDF 3.12M] Order Appointing Equity Receiver [PDF 279K] The above article was reprinted from an announcement on the Federal Trade Commission web site dated March 27, 2001. Check the FTC web site for any changes to the article. |
|||
|
This page was last modified on July 22, 2007.
Privacy Policy | Disclaimers | Terms of Use | Suggestions | Credit Card Security Website Created by & Copyright © 2001-2008 Richard Keyt, All Rights Reserved |
